Monday 24 February 2014

2013 Curriculum

Education in Indonesia is now in the transition time from Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) or in English known as School Based Curriculum to 2013 curriculum which focused on building students’ characters. Total subjects for KTSP are 11, but in 2013 curriculum will have 6 subjects only, which are religion, civics, Bahasa Indonesia, mathematics, art & culture, and also Physical Education.  Furthermore, science and social will be integrated with Bahasa Indonesia. I think that this merging in subjects is quite extreme, because students don’t learn thing specifically anymore, and it might create low level of mastery in each of those subjects.


(Source)


What is the government’s reason behind this new curriculum? The main reason was the failure of schools in creating the syllabus.  Most of the teachers are not able to create syllabus, which leads to unbalanced level of education, the learning is decentralized, but the final exams that determine the completion of school (year 6, year 9 & year 12) are centralized. The exam’s questions are almost the same in all over Indonesia. The different thing is only some numbers and name. Which I think is not fair for students in not so good school, they did not learn those things, but its being asked in the exam. Another reason is that, the same text books will be used for all school in Indonesia to prevent low quality of books and unsuitable materials in the books like what happened before because of different books used in each school. This new curriculum also being implemented due to the development of science and technology, together with raising the education standard in international level.

Before, English in elementary school is an elective subject. The new curriculum removes English from elementary school, which as an English teacher to be I found this is pretty unreasonable. Because later it probably means that the first time for some students learning English is in Junior High School. Even when they were exposed with English in the young age most schools are not able to provide the students with good English. How about later?


Another policy that is changed is removal of Information and Technology subject in junior high school & senior high school, because government thinks that technology should be integrated and had already integrated to students’ life. But I disagree with this; I think government over generalizing the students. Because as I live in small city like Aceh, for example the student that my mom is teaching in one of junior high school in Lhokseumawe and also the teachers, may not even know how to turn on a computer. They are not computer literate. On the other hands, science subjects (mathematics, physics, biology and chemistry) and also religion subject will have additional one hour contact time each as the government’s strategy to produce characterful students.
(Source)

The implementation of this policy is being done gradually, first it was applied in the schools with accreditation A in 295 cities in 33 provinces in Indonesia, which starts in July 2013, and hoped to be fully implemented in all over Indonesia in 2015. The early stage of this implementation showing good response, the teachers said that this builds the characters and student become more active in the class room. But this is the response in from selected schools with good teachers, facilities, and excellence students. But later, how about the implementation in other schools? Because talking about schools in Indonesia it is not just about the school in Jakarta, Bandung and other big cities, but also the schools in rural places like Aceh and Papua.


(Source)


The problem that the curriculum faced is that the level of understanding of teachers is still very low. And it needs long process to give training to the teachers. From a survey, 7 out of 10 teachers are still not sure what 2013 is all about. If teachers and school is not prepared, the whole school management can be ruined and will affect the students’ performance and most importantly, students are not guinea pig, Government can't just make a new curriculum and experiment it on the children. I think before they change the policy, they should train the teachers with enough facilities first and when the teachers are ready, they can start changing.

Overall, I think the governments plan is too rushing, it is not prepared well. It is too early to take such as big decision to change the whole curriculum. Why don’t they check and improve first what’s wrong with the previous curriculum rather than create a new one and confuse the teachers and the students themselves. Maybe the intention is good, want to raise the standard of education. But applying curriculum that had already used in the developed or even modern country, and starts to compare the students in this developing country, it’s just not right.

Hope this transition will bring Indonesia to a better quality of education!